I am not sure what your point is anymore,

My argument was that if you can get practical information from considering the past you should do so.

Your argument is, I won’t support the Democrats.

Cool? I wasn’t asking you to.

A bunch of people, including you, were saying post-mortems are exercises ONLY in shifting blame.

I was saying ONLY that post-mortems are a good idea if they are used to implement improvements. I started from a place of deep criticism of ten years of DNC failure. Somehow, you keep turning my words into a defense of the DNC?

Don’t like the DNC? Cool, totally understandable. I made no argument about if YOU should like the DNC or not.

Don’t like HRC? Cool, totally understandable. I made no argument about if YOU should like HRC or not (except to suggest that her post-mortem could be valuable if used correctly).

No biggie, just saying, a deep cleaning is necessary and that post-mortems are critical to effective deep cleanings.

Thanks for the discussion, but I don’t think that we are talking about the same thing? That said, I do feel everyone’s frustrations with 2016 on all sides.